Personal privacy ≠ corporate privacy
I didn’t intend for the first substantive post here to be devoted to shameless self-promotion, but it’s not every day that a Supreme Court justice gives you a shout-out during an oral argument. I’m...
View Article“AT&T slips into the Supreme Court chamber this morning…”
“…moments before arguments are set to start. He feels slightly affronted that nobody seems to notice him. (AT&T is a very emotional guy.)” Read the whole thing.
View ArticleDecision in FCC v. AT&T
The Supreme Court has decided FCC v. AT&T, the most recent case in which I filed an amicus brief, which I wrote about here. The issue in the case is whether corporations are protected by the...
View ArticleFCC v. AT&T: A dissenting opinion
From Professor Bainbridge: Twelve pages of what purports to be legal and grammatical analysis follows. But Chief Justice Roberts could have summed up his opinion far more succinctly: “Because at least...
View ArticleWhen is corpus linguistics (in)appropriate?
I’ve posted the paper that I presented at this year’s Law & Corpus Linguistics Conference at the BYU Law School. It’s titled “Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation: When Is It...
View Article
